Chintels india ltd vs bhayana builders
WebFeb 11, 2024 · The position was reiterated in the Western Builders case [(2006) 6 SCC 239] and also in Fairgrowth Investments Ltd. v. Custodian . [(2004) 11 SCC 472] . There … WebFeb 12, 2024 · This assertion was made by the honorable Supreme Court of India presided by J. R. F. Nariman, J. Navin Sinha and J. K.M. Joseph in the case of CHINTELS INDIA LTD. vs. BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4028 OF 2024].
Chintels india ltd vs bhayana builders
Did you know?
WebChintels India Limited v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. [SET ASIDE on 11 February 2024 by a 3-judge Supreme Court’s bench in Chintels India Limited v.Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine 80] Court: Delhi High Court Case Number: FAO (OS) Comm. No. 68 of 2024 CS Citation: Not available currently Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon … WebMar 1, 2024 · Recently, in Chintels India Ltd. v Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court (“SC”) of India answered a perennial question of law pertaining to maintainability …
WebCHINTELS INDIA LTD. Vs. BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT. LTD CITATION : CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4028 OF 2024JUDGE : Justice RF NarimanDate : 11.02.2024 LAW POINT : An appeal under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would be maintainable, against an order refusing to condone delay in filing an application under section 34 of WebFeb 11, 2024 · Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge) Appeal (Civil), 4028 of 2024, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2024 CHINTELS INDIA LTD. Versus BHAYANA …
WebChintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. 1 FACTS In Chintels India Ltd.2, the Supreme Court determined whether an appeal was maintainable under section 37 ()[c] of … WebIn view of the Judgment passed by this Court in Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. in Civil Appeal No. 4028 of 2024 on 11.02.2024, we issue notice on the Special Leave Petition, as well as on the application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition, returnable on 05.03.2024. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
WebDiscretion To Grant Post-Award Interest: Analysis Of Morgan Securities And Credits Pvt Ltd v. Videocon Industries Ltd Mondaq October 17, 2024 ...
WebMar 3, 2024 · Refusal To Condone Delay In Filing A Challenge To An Arbitral Award Under §34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 Is Appealable: Chintels India Ltd v … inf3105WebJul 8, 2024 · The present petition was heard along with OMP(COMM) 444/2024 captioned Chintels India Limited vs Bhayana Builders Private Limited - the application filed by Chintels under section 34 of the A&C Act impugning an arbitral award dated 03.05.2024 delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal in respect of the disputes relating to Phase-I of the … logistics coordinator careerWebDec 29, 2024 · In Chintels India Ltd v. Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd, bench of Justices RF Nariman, Navin Sinha and KM Joseph held that an order refusing to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 34 of ... logistics coordinating roleWebAug 19, 1992 · Chintels India Ltd. Vs. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. [Civil Appeal No. 4028 of 2024] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a certificate issued under Article … logistics conversationWebAug 12, 2024 · Chintels India Ltd v. Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd [Judgment dated February 11, 2024] The Supreme Court held that an order refusing to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 is appealable under Section 37 of the Act. 21. Government of Maharashtra (Water Resources Department) v. inf3135WebFeb 11, 2024 · In our opinion, the issue is squarely answered against the respondent by the decision of this Court in Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. [Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal … inf3173WebMay 9, 2024 · In the recent case of Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd., [1] the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Court”) has to put the rest a pertinent issue of law … inf3080